Case Results

Dismissal Secured for Client After On-Field Incident at Reds Game

Our client, a 19-year-old named William Hendon, faced serious charges after a spontaneous decision led him to run onto the outfield at Great American Ball Park during a Reds game. In the heat of the moment, William even managed to perform a backflip before being subdued by law enforcement. As a result, he was charged with criminal trespassing at a public amusement area and obstructing official business.

Understanding the gravity of the situation and the potential long-term consequences of a criminal record, we fought to secure a favorable outcome for William. Through diligent negotiation, we enrolled him in a diversion program. This program required William to pay a $200 fee, complete 30 hours of community service, undergo a drug and alcohol assessment, and take a class on critical thinking.

Upon successful completion of the diversion program, the charges against William were dismissed, sparing him from a criminal record that could have impacted his future. This outcome reflects our commitment to protecting our clients’ futures and ensuring that a momentary lapse in judgment doesn’t define the rest of their lives. Read more about the case at WLWT.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Protecting Parental Rights and Providing Critical Support

Our client, a struggling mother, faced unthinkable circumstances when her 6-year-old son tragically died while chasing after her car as she attempted to leave him behind. The charges were severe, holding her responsible for his death. The case highlighted the difficult choices parents in crisis can face and the lack of options available for those overwhelmed by their situation.

In this case, we brought attention to the complexities surrounding Ohio’s “safe haven” laws, which allow parents to leave newborns at designated locations but do not extend the same protections to older children. We argued that while our client’s actions were driven by desperation, she needed support, not criminalization.

Through our efforts, we focused on connecting her with the resources she desperately needed, including financial assistance and mental health care, to address the root causes of her situation. We emphasized that reaching out for help should never be seen as a crime and that there are avenues for struggling parents to find the support they need.

Our defense strategy not only provided our client with the legal protection she required but also brought awareness to the broader issue of how society can better support parents in crisis. This case underscores the importance of understanding and addressing the challenges faced by parents, ensuring they have access to the help they need before tragedy strikes. Read more about the case at WCPO.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Charges Reduced for Mother in Child Endangerment Case

Theft Charges Against Contractor Successfully Delayed

A Warren County contractor was on the verge of sentencing after being accused of scamming over $71,000 from homeowners. Our client, who had built his career through his business, Equality Contractors 1, was suddenly facing the loss of everything he had worked for.

Six grand theft charges were brought against the contractor after homeowners reported paying for jobs that were never completed. Despite the seriousness of the charges, we knew that rushing to judgment wasn’t in our client’s best interest.

When our client pleaded guilty to two counts of theft earlier this year, the stakes were high. As the sentencing date approached, we became aware of media presence at the courthouse, threatening to jeopardize our client’s safety and future further.

We acted swiftly, securing a continuance to give us the time needed to address the media concerns. The court agreed, recognizing the potential risks our client faced if his identity and involvement in government work were made public.

Thanks to this strategic delay, we’re working to ensure that our client’s safety is protected and that his case is handled with the care it deserves. While the case is still pending, our quick action has already made a significant difference in protecting our client’s future. Read more about this case on WLWT.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Client Facing Abuse Allegations Found Not Guilty by Jury

Abuse allegations against one of our clients jeopardized his future as a home health care aide, a job he had worked in for over a decade.

The client was in his mid-40s with no criminal record when one of his patients told police they were being mistreated by our client. Without a thorough investigation, police sided with the patient, and the aide faced charges of child endangerment and patient abuse.

The case went to trial for months, but our work remained aggressive and unwavering. Gathering discovery on the case was particularly crucial; we were able to argue that the alleged victim was lying, and ultimately, the jury found our client not guilty.

This result not only meant our client was allowed to finally resume work, but also meant he wouldn’t serve six months in jail, pay significant fines, or lose his home healthcare license. We got the charges sealed from our client’s record, and the aide was able to carry on with his reputation and future intact.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Case Thrown Out for Client Charged With Third OVI

A client with two prior OVI charges faced up to a year of jail time and license suspension after being charged with a third OVI offense.

Officers pulled him over for allegedly speeding when they claimed to “smell a small odor” of alcohol in the car. Although our client refused a breathalyzer, he successfully performed a sobriety field test. Nevertheless, he was charged with a third-in-time OVI, and faced significant consequences due to this being a repeat offense.

Upon collecting discovery, we believed there to be no probable cause for his arrest and argued for a motion to suppress. The judge agreed, and through our legal team’s arguments over the lack of evidence against our client, we were able to get the case thrown out completely.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.